Archive for the ‘spoiler’ Category

Really loved this game and enjoyed it tremendously. Also another prime example what incredible mileage one can get out of great voice acting.

Anyway, the game is about teaming up with a ROM (a robot with true AI) in order to find out what happened to its creator. I know, right? SAY NO MORE.

The game has it all, lots of characters, places multiple solutions and several endings. It even has an epilogue. Finally a game where I can’t complain about an ending being to abrupt!

I’m still wondering what Dana Zane was doing in this game, she was a character in another good game I played a while ago – of course I haven’t done any research, but at first glance these games don’t seem to be from the same dev, so I have no idea how that came to be. It’s quite intriguing though, since I tell myself that I play all these games more or less by coincidence.

The Deadly Tower of Monsters is one of these games, which essentially have only one central narration, but manage to get a lot of mileage out of it regardless. There is even a little bit of Stanley Parable thrown into it here and there. I like it!
The game is built around the idea that a director is recording a commentary track for one of his old movies, which gets a new DVD release.

So this director has a ton of stories to share while playing, but also addresses things the player does. It’s done really well, they have thought of a great many scenarios. While the gameplay and the graphics and the sound are all good, the director and the assistant commenting on everything, is the main event here.

It was actually shocking to me how good the graphics were. Both animation and design were much more imaginative and creative than many AAA games I played in recent history. Finally something that has true memorable and distinctive design and isn’t just some generic outing like a thousand other (therefore) forgettable games.

Without them having to say it outright, I was constantly thinking of Ray Harryhausen, tons of the monsters moved/were animated exactly like beasts from his movies. They nailed that stuff. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone even trying anything like that in a game. I had to wonder if it’s harder to animate something that looks like “stop-motion model animation” in the Unreal engine, than it is to do it like everyone else.
It took me only 5 hours to complete the game and I’m really happy I haven’t missed this fun gem.

Ghost 1.0 has the same name problem, I thought, Dex has. Searching for these games is a nightmare and I can only imagine this hurt their success. They are both really great and I think I’m growing fond of this metroidvania type of game. I can’t say I’ve played many, but pretty much every one I have played was a huge hit to me. Dust comes immediately to mind, which is another of my all time favorites.
Ghost 1.0 has good gameplay, good music, nice graphics, good controls, great story and characters honestly and… Does a good game need anything more? I don’t think so. It’s all here.
I enjoyed the game a lot, although I suck at it. There’s this rescue mission in the game and it took me ages to complete it (I hate that it’s not possible to save during this long mission, it has to be completed in one session). Maybe it’s supposed to be hard, because the menu allows the player to skip it, but geez… I had to do some scenes like 10 times before I was able to pass them. :D In a worse game this might have kept me from finishing it.
The game offers more smaller side-missions after the main story is done. These shorter missions (which have to be unlocked during the main campaign) are also very brutal as far as I’ve played them so far.
The game definitely lacks whatever type of frame-limiter. It runs with ~2700 FPS, which seems like a slight overkill…

Hard West is kind of between XCOM and Valkyria Chronicles, as far as the story (or a story) is concerned and uses a “choose your own adventure” vehicle to tell it, it resembles a little bit the interactive slides in Pillars of Eternity. The gameplay is straight XCOM though. I wish the tactical battles would steal even more from XCOM, since there aren’t that many disruptive events within a mission. While the game has a ton of guns (too many almost), there is little else and the guns don’t really differ much, besides their range and damage – so there are usually ~5 guns that fulfill the exact same role. For all the typical Western tropes, this game has no scenes on trains and there are no Gatling guns. In that regard it’s the opposite of Call of Juarez: Gunslinger, which obviously constantly has Gatling guns. :P
The story is told in several loosely connected and separate campaigns. Nothing carries over between those campaigns, so all earned gear is gone again. I mean, ultimately you only need the gun called “the judge”, but still. :P
There is also no leveling for individual characters. All characters can be equipped individually (there are also cards which can buff stats), but all this stuff can be given to whomever.
The graphics are good and the sounds are alright alright alright, but for everyone who likes the old west and XCOM, this doesn’t matter all that much anyway, since there is no competition here. I’m glad I played it and I had fun, but it won’t become an obsession like XCOM 2.

PS: After Mad Max this is only the second game to have darker screenshots for whatever crazy reason. The brightness in the game itself while playing it was ALRIGHT.

Funny thing is, after playing Torment, I thought why not go back and play Planescape: Torment again? So I installed it, with all the mods and whatnot, approximately 1 day after I did that, this Enhanced Edition was announced. So I was obviously going to wait for it to come out. GOG even gave a discount to everyone who already had PST in their account…

As if that wasn’t a lucky break, it got even much better, because I only played PST once, like 10 years ago and I’ve forgotten A LOT about it. So there I was, playing this game about an amnesiac, who sometimes has flashbacks, as a sort of amnesiac who had flashbacks about his first playthrough. THIS is probably the ideal way to experience this game!

Story, characters, quests – all totally hold up. I can even say, at this point, this game was way ahead of its time, since there are games now which fail to pull off some elements as good as Torment did it 18 years ago.
I can only criticize the ending and the bit leading up to it. The game starts with enormous amounts of text (which is good because the writing is almost always quite remarkable – better than many current games, not kidding) for everything, so much in fact, that the ending just feels rushed in comparison – it might not have been as noticeable in a lesser game. I really wish it could have been elaborated upon a bit more.

Sure, it’s possible to piece the most important parts together, but again, in comparison with the detailed rest of the game, it’s “short”. It really made me wanna read the book, in hopes of reaching a deeper insight, but of course it’s not really available anymore. So scratch that. A nice moment like the one at the ending of Witcher 2 (a huge/long conversation about everything that happened in the game takes place :D), really would have been welcome here.

The EE itself is rather well done, I mean… full text search for the journal? Hello? It’s like a dream come true! It’s amazing (tab-highlighting is the best!). They introduced several features I was hoping for, all without really taking anything away (but to play it safe, they added options to shut down all the new stuff). It’s without a doubt the best way to experience PST now. It always pains me a little to say this, because I don’t want to undermine all the tremendous work all the modders have done over so many years – it’s beyond the shadow of a doubt their merit as well, that these games are still alive after all these years and yet there are just some things even all the mods couldn’t improve.

I had a single issue with this EE, the game would crash when opening the map screen in several locations (thankfully the game auto-saves with every map transition). This is definitely something I hope they can still fix. I could outright reproduce it in the drowned nations and it happened in inner curst and on the baator map too. In the hive, for example, it never happened, although I used the map there a thousand times. Other than that, this thing seemed to be rock-solid.

GOG Galaxy counted 49,5 hours, while Steam counted 63 hours for my Torment: Tides of Numenera playthrough. Of course these numbers aren’t exact, since I sometimes let them running without actively playing, but obviously they aren’t so far off that I could say Tides of Numenera was shorter (something I heard repeatedly which is why I’m considering this as debunked now).

PS: The thing with the screenshots is true about this game too, I was so immersed, that I forgot all about taking any, which is why I now have none of many interesting areas…

I’d definitely see TP as one of the games “we” owe to crowd-funding. Games of this nature just aren’t the norm, you know, with a little bit of character and all that. I’m just always wondering if this is clicking in any meaningful way with broader audiences. As a backer, I’m pleased with this game, this game did a lot for the people who get all the references actually, but you certainly can’t get rich off of ME. But then again, I already got what I wanted. But then again, if I want to play a sequel… I’m just hoping they get to do another one, doesn’t even have to be a direct sequel. These guys seem to be at their best if they just get to develop a true original, instead of being tied to whatever franchise.

Honestly, I don’t have all that much to say about the game itself. The only thing I absolutely want to point out, is that the puzzles weren’t as hard as they were in those old games. IMHO. There were quite a few, but they were always fair. The majority of obstacles were designed in a way, that had me knowing what I had to do on top of knowing WHY. From that position it’s never THAT hard to solve a puzzle. I never had to resort to combining countless items in sheer desperation, just hoping for something to happen at some point. That’s something I did all the time way back then. Well I did.

Another good sign for me is, that I took almost no screenshots, because playing the game had me so consumed, that I forgot all about that.

What? I’m supposed to throw in some criticism? No I’m not, I can do whatever the hell I want to here. :P But okay. The only thing that is at the top of my head, is how characters describe the world. There are 5 playable characters in TP and except for some unique situations, every character says the exact same thing when looking at whatever. This really disappointed me. The characters are very different people and there is no chance in hell they would describe anything 1:1. It’s possible to explain that away, even in the game’s own logic, but still. I would have loved it if Ray and Reyes, for example, would have had their own sentences.

It’s possible this has to do with budget, but The Cave also had these long stretches which were identical for all characters, no matter which you took inside – in other words this might just be a Ron Gilbert thing. I don’t know.

Continuing in this line of thought, it’s odd that these 5 characters kind of work together, although they never talked to each other outside the very ending, in which they suddenly start, I wish there would have been much more of that. Most of them never even meet until later in the game, so they shouldn’t even know each other, let alone collaborate. It would have been great if the story somehow would have offered an explanation for that. Sure, games back then certainly didn’t have anything like that either, back then people were happy they got to play more than one character, but this is certainly one of the characteristics of older games that didn’t need to be conserved for today. Especially in adventure games which are supposed to have a focus on story and such. Games like Oxenfree get a lot of mileage out of nicely written dialogs and character stuff, is all I’m saying.

But these are all minor nitpicks of course, so everyone who’s into this genre should have a good time. And it’s not as if everything is the way it was during these earlier days. There are more than enough moments, which underline how much can be done, even if the graphics appear to be this oldschool at first glance. I really loved how Ransom’s trailer “moves” depending on how Ransom shifts his weight. The game has several of these nice little “tricks” to offer.

Will this game have an effect like Monkey Island did? Probably not, but I never expected it to in the first place (this might sound harsher than it is supposed to; one of my awesome skills). The devs have also given the game great after launch support. I personally didn’t encounter any bugs during my complete playthrough, but they quickly fixed everything that could be a problem for someone anyway. :)

tl;dr I wonder if they intended to sort of redo Mass Effect 1, or if it was some accident. Mass Effect 1, in all of its wonky and sluggish glory, sure had its faults, but it also had a soul and suggested vast potential. It made people dream. That’s why many people, including myself, liked it. Mass Effect: Andromeda might merely be reminiscent of Mass Effect 1’s soul than offer one of its own, but I’ll take it (it’s the JJ Abrams age [flashier than the original in some regards, but adds overall nothing new which happens to somehow cheapen the experience, at least for some] after all). Was probably an accident. :P A lucky one.

And now, my dear 0 to 1 readers, please enjoy my unedited (I promise), just typed down, full text:

I’ve read several good/true articles about Mass Effect: Andromeda, but they still seemed to not fully realize the one, most glaring and obvious thing about this game: EA remade Mass Effect 1. Mass Effect: Andromeda is to Mass Effect 1, what Star Wars: Episode VII is to Star Wars: Episode IV. It’s a soft reboot. The Normandy is now called Tempest, the Citadel is now the Nexus (honestly, running around in the huge Nexus and Ark segments could not possible feel more like the Citadel from ME1, they even have these tram sequences which fill in for the elevator rides :D) and the Mako is now the Nomad. These things barely look different. It’s a different take to the degree, that it seems perfectly plausible, that only different drafts were used, from art which was created back then for Mass Effect 1.

The elements Mass Effect 1 is remembered by the most, are a ton of wonky bits and pieces such as the inventory (you had to clear it out a lot and it needed way too much micromanaging) and especially the Mako drive sections on whatever planet. Those are, let’s say: unforgettable. :D Lots of people still (myself included) loved the game for its potential, even if it was never fully realized.

Mass Effect: Andromeda is seriously the 2017 version of that, in a more sluggish engine (this game suffers from not sticking to Unreal, shame on EA). :D
And yes, I think this is such a nice thing to say about a game which tried so hard to be nothing more than a skin for Dragon Age: Inquisition. I was so seriously let down and disappointed by DAI, it’s painful. I never really regretted buying a game before. But then why isn’t MEA as bad and as frustratingly disappointing? The reason for that is gameplay. In DAI the whole gameplay consisted out of holding one button down when there was a fight (because of the ranged attacks of my mage I was at least spared to awkwardly run around, this one button down-holding is even worse with a melee fighter) and waiting for it to finally end (Atari 2600 era games were more exciting to play) and picking Elfroot between fights. This too is the nicest way in which I can still describe Dragon Age: Inquisition. :P All the awesome lore was wasted on this one.

Mass Effect: Andromeda on the other hand at least has solid gunplay, which next to everyone should like, who is into third person shooters generally (I like this concept). It is also heavily supported by interesting abilities which are actually fun to use. While the biotic charge (easily my favorite ability from Mass Effect) sadly feels different here than it did in Mass Effect 3, it’s still awesome to flash through an encounter like this. I can’t even think of a game in this genre, which offers the same. This fact, of gameplay that is actually fun, also includes the driving around. Again, in Dragon Age: Inquisition the mounts were total crap, because they were only slightly faster than being on foot and it also canceled out all the party banter – the only thing that made walking around for hours (to pick Elfroot) barely tolerable. The Mako, uh – NOMAD on the other hand is a lot faster than walking and has some options like jump jets. Again, FUN. The Nomad also doesn’t forbid party banter. Come to think of it, the Mako back in 2007 didn’t either! How did they manage to forget this lesson for DAI?

The freedom of movement has never been better in a Mass Effect game. The character now supports quick, actually helpful, dashes and the jump jet is a lot of fun. It’s also so appropriate for this setting.
So even if there are a lot of insulting faces and facial animations, bugs (too bad EA couldn’t afford another 3 months of beta testing), badly optimized engine, too much MMO-esque collecting shit […] at least the game in between is actual fun to play. Something they had completely forgotten to implement in DAI.

It also tremendously helps to imagine, that these zones are closer to what they originally wanted to build, when they could only do these barren landscapes in Mass Effect 1, planets which only differed by having different colors (well mostly). On most of these (side-) planets in ME1, you couldn’t do much more than pick up the same 2 things (Tali had to open all of these damn probes :P), it helps remembering how it was back then, when one is about to complain here.

Still, I guess now it’s time to talk about the main bad guy here, the root of all evil, the mother of mediocrity. And that is, to the surprise of no one, “open-world”. Unless you happen to be CD Projekt RED (or maybe Rocksteady before Arkham Knight), open-world is almost generally the cause for an unmissable decline in overall quality of content. It might be a good idea for some games like GTA, but in general you have either quantity or quality. The fact that “every” dev now tries to shove an “open-world” into their game, whether it makes sense or not, prevents many of these games to be anywhere near as good as they might have been otherwise (I’m skipping the debate here, if these several different zones even qualify as open-world or what brand of open-world those are then).

If I would have been the game director on MEA, I probably would have cut 50% of its content (although MEA entirely lacks actual places/cities like Novigrad in Witcher 3! Why not build something astonishing like that?!?). I’m not even kidding – I don’t like obvious padding. I meant hate. Mass Effect 2 was criticized too (by some), for abandoning some of the ideas of Mass Effect 1, but they were only being realistic, about what they were able to do and what not. As a result, we might have gotten a game that might have felt smaller in scope, but at least their focus made the content we did get pretty good. To me, Mass Effect 2 was their Empire Strikes Back. Best characters in the whole series and there were actual stakes, since everyone (including Shepard) could die. We are not seeing anything like that anymore.

It’s not just that squad mates in MEA can’t even leave you and it doesn’t matter what you say to them, they also recruit themselves. That is so weird. They just show up and declare themselves crew, without giving the player any options. Mass Effect 1 could be played from start to finish without even recruiting some of the people! The mere existence of that option is awesome. This must also be the sole thing DAI did actually better than MEA, because at least there you can send several of your potential companions to hell. Wouldn’t it be interesting for the pathfinder to end up alone, if the player messes things up or simply wants it that way? Yes, so we obviously can’t have that!

MEA isn’t exactly as buggy as some describe it, I had maybe 2 (minor) quests which were outright broken and couldn’t be properly completed. It’s more about the general unpolished feeling of… almost everything. It’s a very clear case of a game which would have needed a beta of at least another 3 months, easily. The craziest thing that happened to me during gameplay, was when I was driving up a mountain with the Nomad, while also using the booster. Suddenly I was just standing there on foot with my companions and the Nomad was gone. It was so bizarre. Thankfully there is fast travel in this game. I would have died out there in this desert on foot otherwise.

What actually drags the whole game noticeably down, is how sluggish gameplay feels overall (Andromeda shouldn’t have shipped like this). Other than what some videos might want people to believe, MEA isn’t that much of a major bug infestation as many other games. This game is far from Arkham Knight for example. And yet, there is constantly something happening, usually minor, that reminds you that they could have done much more QA on this game. Or should have. Even if they would have done 3 more months of beta instead of releasing, they would have had their hands full. That much is painfully obvious. What’s aggravating, is that Mass Effect would have sold 3 months from now too, just with much nicer reviews/reception. There is such a long list of glaring glitches in this game, I don’t even want to type it down anymore. It’s 10+ things everyone will encounter who plays this for just a few hours. I wanted to type it down, but I can’t now. I didn’t even try to make screenshots of the problems in this game, and yet I accidentally captured a lot of them, simply because this doesn’t need any kind of special bug hunting.

The real tragedy here is what I call by now “the BioWare problem”, because they are known for hardly fixing anything, which means if a game releases in a bad shape, this is basically how it’s going to stay. Some other companies do a “Director’s Cut” of their games a year later and MEA is a prime example of a game which could desperately need that. But none of that is going to happen ever, instead the game ends with announcing the next DLC – they are going to sell for more money.
Quarians, which are usually a fan favorite, are very prominently absent from this game, but just before the campaign ends, you receive a transmission from their ark, which is really nothing but a very thinly veiled announcement of the Quarian ark DLC. Which will probably cost at least another 15 bucks. If not 20.

A few more things about the potentially strongest part of the game, the combat: Adding the jump jet was a great idea, no doubt. It’s an ideal fit for such an action game, although it makes it harder to overlook, that outside of combat, e.g. during running around on the Nexus, walking can be a little bit like walking in water – I wish controls would be faster, more responsive; even ME3 was more slick in this regard.

The various powers/abilities alongside the now trusty guns make it a lot of fun to fight all the various enemies. The guns are still the same ones which were introduced as early as in Mass Effect 2 in 2010. That’s not a negative for me, since I like them (the weapons are also the sole noteworthy “loot” in the game, there is nothing else unique/of interest to find). It’s kinda cool to come back to them and have something familiar wait for you. The various weapons, which were really fleshed out in Mass Effect 3 were always a strong point for the game. It’s about guns and conversations after all. Especially in ME3 all guns had these distinct features of sound and behavior, not just their looks to make them memorable. Of course they also added a lot of new weapons, although those haven’t gripped me as much. A few weapons out of the ME3 arsenal seem to be missing now, sadly. I immediately noticed that the M-12 Locust seems to be gone, which disappointed me, it was a favorite weapon of mine in ME2. For some crazy reason they nerfed it in ME3 into an almost useless state (which also contradicted the ME2 lore, that it was this super-powerful weapon and therefore rare collector’s item) – at least as far as the MP was concerned.

Another very weird choice/bad call was made, when they removed the SMG category in MEA. Yeah – SMGs are now “pistols”. That’s… why? I don’t get it. Of all the things they could have cut, this is what they chose? Maybe that’s part of why some weapons like the Locust vanished, since they are so clearly not pistols. As fun as the combat mostly is, I couldn’t help but notice, that guns usually don’t “feel” powerful, because they do not have any effect on enemies, except have the game subtract the damage values if you hit them correctly. Sounds exciting, doesn’t it? In ME3 there were ragdoll effects going on left and right and heads were ripped off almost constantly. Did they save money on animations? Is this a ratings thing? Na, saving money sounds more likely. :D

But speaking of animations, one of the things I loved about ME3MP, was that all the various characters had their very own dodge animations. Didn’t matter if you played as an Asari, a Vorcha or a Human. All of them had their own lore-friendly animations. That was great! In the multiplayer of MEA however, all characters seem to have (obviously I haven’t unlocked all of them yet) the identical jump jet-dodge. Sad! It cut out a lot of flavor. Speaking of MP. Something feels a little bit off in comparison to ME3MP. It really shouldn’t, since it is an almost direct copy of it. There were hardly any changes made. The jump jet is welcome here as well, although it is surprisingly not as necessary as it is in the single player, since there are not really any obstacles to overcome. In MP it’s purely there for fun. The best new addition to MP however is, that you can now mute these bastards, who hear loud music while playing and don’t close their mikes. Or who do even worse things like singing or screaming suddenly. Once I had a guy fight with his girlfriend while he was playing ME3MP. Also, a lot of people were on the phone during their sessions. It’s inconceivable how crazy some people are. Finally I don’t have to rip my headset off any longer and play in total silence just to protect my sanity. :P

So what’s left to say? I liked how quests often used all gameplay elements the game has to offer. Driving, shooting, scanning and the galaxy map. I even kind of liked the Space-Sudoku, at least there’s something besides shooting and walking/driving (I’m the one person on the planet who didn’t hate the minigames in ME2 for the same reason). Some quests contain following a trail on the galaxy map and are ended by landing somewhere and fight it out there. That’s great, to tie it all together like that. As far as I’m concerned, I would have loved it if they would have gone much farther with that. I would have liked one or two missions in which you would have to sneak in somewhere, for example. Or maybe even just as an alternative, with different rewards then.
What they didn’t do with the galaxy map, is the starting of new quests. Back in ME1 it was possible to find new quests like this, by scanning something. All the MEA galaxy map ever does, is to offer resources or XP. All quests are given/started on the Nexus or one of the 5 zones. Meaning, you’ll never find anything interesting while scanning whatever star system which doesn’t have already an open quest or a planet to land on. All that’s going to happen, is sitting through the beautiful and super-long planet to planet flight animations. Each time.

The main story is just kinda there, it’s not really endearing besides offering more interesting levels to play through (and have your squad mates say contextual things – the best story mission in the game is probably Liam Kosta’s loyalty mission because it’s FUN). The story is basically, a bad guy shows up and then you kill him, that’s it (he isn’t even scanned, although I’m sure I scanned everything else in the game :P). If you think you could subsume every story like that, you are not as right as you like to believe, because in this scenario, that’s actually it. There are countless Star Trek episodes with a deeper and more thought-provoking plot. I don’t know why they couldn’t just steal something (they usually don’t have any problems with that). There are so many solid sci-fi stories out there. The story isn’t emotional either, which would be one method to make even a mediocre story memorable, or at least more enjoyable at the time. It doesn’t help that, even here, they couldn’t stop themselves from making the PC a special messiah/savior again. It’s always unnecessary, but especially so in a setting like this. The pathfinder is just a glorified scout essentially, that’s seriously it and yet everyone acts like they just met god. It’s crazy and off-putting. Why is BioWare even doing this? Do they believe that all their players are narcissists or people with very low self-esteem who are desperately looking for something like this? It does not compute.

The most intriguing story piece for me was, that the Andromeda Initiative was secretly funded by a mysterious benefactor and that Jien Garson was actually murdered and not killed in an accident – which means it was probably somehow tied to the former. Of course all of this is completely dropped and never resolved. So maybe this is just another hook for a future paid-DLC like the Quarians (I hope they burn in hell if it is), or it’s just a red herring. Either way, it’s a serious letdown. Making the whole game/story about finding out what the true purpose of the Andromeda Initiative was, would have been so much more thrilling already, than anything in the story we’ve gotten instead. You could even have revealed that the bad guy was the benefactor and he only founded the Andromeda Initiative to have his victims come to him willingly, that this was his technique to get a hold of new test subjects. Nobody would have missed people then, because officially they wouldn’t have gone missing like people who were kidnapped outright, it could have been presented as a slightly smart plan. That would have been such a cool twist and it also would have helped to make the bad guy more relevant instead of being little more than a placeholder for the circumstance that there “has to be” some villain (they even have a Darth Maul in this game, the main-villain has a sidekick named “the sword” who has zero lines in the game and only shows up to be killed – silently). 5 years for this non-plot…

Before I forget it, I have scanned every single star system/planet in Helios and yet it only says 96% at the very end (all the individual systems show 100%). I wonder why that is. Does this mean the final 4% can only be completed by buying additional DLC?

btw: If anyone found it a little odd, that every single Batman villain was always in the same part of town Batman was in in the Arkham games, will really love that “every relative of every character” from the Mass Effect series mysteriously joined the Andromeda Initiative so they could be encountered by the pathfinder in Andromeda. :P Conrad Verner’s sister, Zaeed Massani’s son…

PS: Fighting the architects was much more fun than fighting the dragons in DAI, although it’s obviously the exact same thing. It’s not forbidden to be brave, to be original, to do fresh and maybe even exciting new things you know. No idea why I just said that. :)

PPS: The squad mates are nothing to write home about. You could mention them on a blog somewhere, if you must. I guess. Although Cora (probably the most normal-looking face in the game), Peebee/Not-Sera and Drack/Not-Wrex were a lot more likeable than people were lead to believe initially. It’s a little bit jarring though, that they have people like Natalie Dormer in the game and gave them hardly anything profound to say. The Ryders sound a little bit generic to me, no memorable voices who stand out the way Mark Meer and Jennifer Hale did.

Speaking of the Ryders, both male and female Ryder always exist in the game, they probably stole… took inspiration for this from Fallout 4, although it is done better here, since you can play the other one (you didn’t pick at the start) at some point. That was a nifty idea (the game could have needed so much more of), so congrats to who… WHOMever came up with it. :)

“Just” finished Torment. The only thing I regret is not playing Planescape: Torment first/again, because it’s like 10 years since I played that game (yeah yeah, uh the irony of my memory being gone…). A closer comparison might have been nice. Anyway, since it’s always easier to talk about the bad stuff, I’ll start with that.
Number one annoyance must be, that the game doesn’t show how far a character can move during a turn, so a lot of moving with the mouse cursor is necessary, to figure out the edges. It’s especially annoying during long crisis moments, in which all characters have to move (e.g. the “heist” on the alien space station…).

Overall this game doesn’t have any big bugs, especially none which would break quests. Okay, I didn’t encounter any. Who knows if quests can’t break, given the many possibilities… Thus, the general high polish of the game makes the peerless dungeon without doubt the buggiest part of the game. I entered it, started fighting drones and “had to” leave again, because all my resources were already drained from previous adventures (and I couldn’t have known that shutting down the consoles would heal me). When I returned after resting, all robots were still dead/destroyed, but their bodies were still moving around a bit, as if they were still alive. When I opened a door after a crisis occurred, the game crashed, which was my sole crash in the entire game. After restarting and reloading I got through this by finishing the crisis first before opening the door again. As soon as I got out of this place, I never encountered such a problem again.
The pathfinding managed to get the last castoff stuck in 2 or 3 places. This too never happened to me again, after leaving the first city.
At one point I had to unequip and re-equip an item, before the effect of my newly selected concentration skill (neutralizes negative effects of bonded items) became active. Pretty sure that’s what happened.
The ending epilogues were the only thing where I outright thought it was done badly. First, the epilogues are displayed simultaneously to the ending credits (who thought that was a good idea) and each text has a “next” button beneath it, which naturally made me think I would have to click this button to move on to the next one. Second, that’s not the case – after some time, the next epilogue will show up without warning (so the next button is ultimately only there to skip text). I couldn’t read one of the texts, because I expected I would have all the time in the world to do it. So for the next bits I speed-read everything, to make sure I wouldn’t miss more info.
But again, all in all incredible polish. They definitely stepped up their QA since Wasteland 2, this game was riddled with bugs on release day.

So on to the actual game then! I don’t think there’s all that much to say, since, once again, I feel confident to state, that they simply delivered the game they promised during their campaign. To this day, not a single crowdfunding campaign, I participated in, disappointed me.
Torment is deep, detailed and interesting. From start to finish. Is it possible to find stuff in it for nitpicking? Sure, but what really matters, is that they got it mostly right most of the time. And they sure did.
I’d like to mention, that Torment: Tides of Numenera is as different from Pillars of Eternity, as Planescape: Torment was from Baldur’s Gate. That alone is another win.
I absolutely expect inXile to throw out some patches/improvements for this in due time and I’m definitely playing the game again in the future. Yay!

PS: It took me 59 hours (says Steam) to complete the game, as far as I know I played all quests in the game and I tried to actually read everything. I didn’t hurry and focused on enjoying myself.

Also:

Torment: Tides of Numenera

Stasis

A lifetime ago I really wanted to play Sanitarium and I even bought it on GOG (years ago), but to this day I haven’t touched it (shocker). So this is the position from which I’m judging that Stasis appears to be kind of similar to it (I swear I had no idea the wiki page even mentions Stasis!). “Nowadays” the majority of games are either first or third person 3D OR outright throwbacks like Thimbleweed Park, who actively try to be reminiscent of games of another era. So by default it’s almost rare to get any game which deviates from these few formulas. Devs only seldomly try to mix genres or apply a genre to any unusual, varying format. Certain top down views are “always” real-time strategy, but rarely action and 2D views from the side are adventures, but not e.g. strategy games.

So here comes Stasis as an isometric adventure game, in a tonally dark science-fiction setting, which could be compared (in the broadest sense) to something like Dead Space. The game has no action sequences, which might be a little odd, given the setting and for some gamers this might even detract from the atmosphere (as it’s supposed to be so dangerous at times), but I prefer no action to action which is implemented poorly, so things could be much worse, as far as I’m concerned.

The only negatives that I have to think of, which definitely should be pointed out, are that there is no reliable consistency between cursor icons. What I mean by that is, that certain actions have their own icon, so obviously a player will just assume without an interaction icon, they won’t be able to interact – WRONG. For no reason whatsoever, the game abandons its logic at several points throughout the game and items with the “look at”-icon can and must be clicked regardless, to progress even. It’s obviously annoying to be stuck because of that. I can also see no reason why this wasn’t fixed in a patch at some point, since this seems to be a good example for something, which should (after all) be relatively easy to fix. I’m curious to find out, if their newer games will be improved in this regard. It is not obvious to me if this is just an oversight or intentional bad game design.

I liked the game more than enough to also start playing Cayne. This game seems to take place in the same universe and I’m eager to learn, if it will shed some light on issues, Stasis remained too ambiguous about.

This game is def one of the craziest titles I’ve ever played, which is – of course – awesome, but then there are the other parts which are just frustrating. These elements further split into bad design and being a bad port. It’s impossible to overlook, that this game wasn’t developed for PC. A menu which can be used with a mouse, is too much to ask. Simple tasks are therefore much more of a hassle than they should be. For general problems, which go beyond the port, there are situations in which the camera isn’t free and is fixed towards a certain path, while there still can be lootable crates on the sides, which isn’t all that much fun to play. The worst crime in this game however is, that there are several boss fights which demand hammering the left mouse key like a madman. This button mashing madness should be banned from all of gaming. But even so, I hardly ever saw such a severe case. At one point, I was about to uninstall the game, because no matter how much I tried to break my mouse, the boss fight wouldn’t continue. I finally got through it after failing like 10 times and I’m sure it was just dumb luck. There are several theories floating